<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Financial Management &#8211; MSP Growth Solutions</title>
	<atom:link href="https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/category/financial-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://mspgrowthsolutions.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 10:38:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">240741677</site>	<item>
		<title>What Makes Your IT Business Valuable?</title>
		<link>https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/what-makes-your-it-business-valuable/</link>
					<comments>https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/what-makes-your-it-business-valuable/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 10:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Management]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/?p=742</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ask ten IT services owners what their company is worth and you&#8217;ll get ten different answers. Someone quotes a multiple they heard at a conference. Someone cites a peer&#8217;s &#8220;big exit.&#8221; Someone guesses based on how hard they work. Ask experienced buyers (strategic acquirers, private equity groups, roll-up operators) and the conversation changes fast. They [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Ask ten IT services owners what their company is worth and you&#8217;ll get ten different answers. Someone quotes a multiple they heard at a conference. Someone cites a peer&#8217;s &#8220;big exit.&#8221; Someone guesses based on how hard they work.</p>



<p>Ask experienced buyers (strategic acquirers, private equity groups, roll-up operators) and the conversation changes fast. They talk about profit predictability, risk, operational maturity, and how dependent the business is on you. To them, valuation isn&#8217;t just a number. It&#8217;s a judgment about whether the business will keep producing results after ownership changes.</p>



<p>This is the same shift you go through when you stop being the person who does everything and become the person who builds the machine that does everything. You move from heroic effort to engineered systems: financial discipline, operating rhythms, standards, and leaders who can run outcomes without you.</p>



<p>Even if you never sell, the qualities buyers pay for are the same ones that make your company calmer to run, more profitable, and less fragile.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How Buyers Actually Think About Value</strong></h2>



<p>Most serious buyers evaluate an IT services firm through three practical questions.</p>



<p><strong>Can we predict next year&#8217;s cash flow with confidence?</strong> They want stable, recurring revenue and low volatility. Not &#8220;we had a great quarter because we landed a big project,&#8221; but &#8220;our base renews, our expansion is repeatable, and we can forecast.&#8221; Predictability is an asset, and it comes from your business model, your people, and your systems.</p>



<p><strong>Do margins improve as you scale, or do they flatline?</strong> Buyers love growth, but they love scalable efficiency more. They&#8217;re looking for evidence that gross margin dollars and profitability rise as revenue rises, because your delivery engine gets better, not just bigger.</p>



<p><strong>Will the business survive new ownership without the founder as the glue?</strong> This is where deals get discounted or die. If you close every deal, handle every escalation, and approve every key decision, the buyer isn&#8217;t buying a transferable asset. They&#8217;re buying founder dependence.</p>



<p>A useful framing is this: predictable profits come from the model plus the quality of people plus the quality of systems. Buyers are underwriting all three.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Financial Quality: What Your Numbers Say About the Future</strong></h2>



<p><strong>Real profitability, not founder sacrifice.</strong> The first adjustment sophisticated buyers make is owner compensation. If profits look strong only because you&#8217;re underpaying yourself, the &#8220;profit&#8221; isn&#8217;t real. It&#8217;s deferred wages.</p>



<p>Best-in-class firms separate the owner&#8217;s two hats: executive pay (market-based, on the income statement) and shareholder distributions (from profits). That creates a truer earnings picture and eliminates a common diligence haircut.</p>



<p>As a practical guardrail, pay yourself a real market wage for the job you do, then hold the business accountable to a real profit target after that wage.</p>



<p><strong>Productivity engine, not headcount scaling.</strong> Buyers reward firms where productivity improves over time. One powerful way to talk about this is gross profit per labor dollar: are you getting more gross profit output per dollar of delivery labor as the company matures?</p>



<p>If that ratio stalls, buyers see &#8220;labor creep,&#8221; which is the slow accumulation of rework, exceptions, and extra roles that feel like &#8220;better service&#8221; but silently drain margin.</p>



<p><strong>Cash discipline that funds itself.</strong> Buyers love businesses that can fund the &#8220;must-pays&#8221; from operations: taxes, debt obligations, essential reinvestment, and owner distributions, all without constantly feeling cash-tight.</p>



<p>This is where better billing habits matter (milestone billing, shorter cycles, fewer aging receivables), but so does something many IT providers skip: forecasting revenue with leading indicators instead of gut feelings.</p>



<p>High-performing providers treat forecasting as a process. They track qualified lead flow, define sales stages, calculate historical conversion ratios and cycle time, run pipeline review meetings, and update forecasts regularly. When you can show that revenue forecasting is a discipline with CRM hygiene and a weekly pipeline rhythm, uncertainty drops and buyers pay more.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Revenue Quality: Stability Beats Excitement</strong></h2>



<p><strong>Recurring revenue is necessary, but durability is what matters.</strong> Yes, buyers like contracted recurring revenue. But they look underneath it. They examine renewal rates and cohort retention, client concentration risk, how standardized the client base is (or how customized it is), and whether your contracts protect economics over time.</p>



<p>One of the biggest hidden killers of IT services value is letting inflation and cost creep eat your pricing. Top performers raise prices systematically, on a schedule, on new and existing clients, with tight controls on exceptions. They build increases into recurring contracts where possible. This protects service quality, employee experience, and long-term competitiveness.</p>



<p><strong>Sales that isn&#8217;t &#8220;founder magic.&#8221;</strong> A repeatable sales engine is one buyers can underwrite. A founder-only engine is key-person risk.</p>



<p>A buyer wants to see a defined ideal client profile, a clear stage-based sales process, consistent pipeline review meetings, documented qualification and disqualification rules, and pricing integrity with less &#8220;discounting to win.&#8221;</p>



<p>Here&#8217;s a high-leverage improvement: monetize discovery. Top performers move the qualification point forward by charging for technical assessments, including operational maturity assessments. It reduces wasted pre-sales effort, increases close rates, and can differentiate you in the market.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Operational Maturity: The Execution Premium</strong></h2>



<p>Buyers don&#8217;t pay more for vision decks. They pay for operating discipline.</p>



<p><strong>Operating rhythms that convert strategy into reality.</strong> High-quality businesses have cadence. They run weekly leadership meetings focused on outcomes and exceptions. They conduct monthly financial reviews where managers explain variances and corrective action. They hold quarterly resets to improve systems and reduce risk.</p>



<p>This is &#8220;execution as a system.&#8221; It&#8217;s one of the most reliable predictors that results will continue after acquisition.</p>



<p><strong>Standards: the antidote to chaos and the shortcut to margin.</strong> If there&#8217;s one operational trait that changes everything for IT service providers, it&#8217;s technology standards.</p>



<p>Top-quartile providers pick a single defined stack per layer (identity, endpoint, backup, network, and so on) and require customer compliance, ideally during onboarding. If a prospect won&#8217;t become compliant, mature firms often walk away, because you can&#8217;t deliver consistent security, reliability, and flat-fee economics while supporting endless variants.</p>



<p>The key is that standards aren&#8217;t a policy memo. They&#8217;re a sales strategy, a delivery strategy, and a training strategy. High performers even brand their stack as a versioned architecture (something like &#8220;Business Optimization Architecture v3&#8221;) and preview upgrades in quarterly business reviews 9 to 18 months ahead so clients budget and adopt smoothly.</p>



<p>Standards reduce exceptions, shrink training time, increase automation, and improve customer experience. Buyers see that and think: &#8220;lower risk, higher margin, easier integration.&#8221;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Owner Independence: Building a Business That Transfers</strong></h2>



<p>Founder dependence is a direct tax on valuation.</p>



<p><strong>Three foundation seats buyers trust.</strong> To reduce key-person risk, buyers want to see real ownership of outcomes across three seats.</p>



<p>The Service or Delivery Leader owns SLA performance, backlog health, reopens, change success, capacity planning, and critically, delivery productivity and gross margin control.</p>



<p>The Revenue Leader owns pipeline quality, stage conversion, pricing discipline, renewals and expansion, and consistent prospecting.</p>



<p>The Finance or Admin Leader owns clean books, accounts receivable discipline, forecasting, and serves as the &#8220;steward of truth&#8221; who keeps the company on its financial guardrails.</p>



<p>When these roles have authority (not just titles), the business becomes transferable.</p>



<p><strong>Align incentives to real margin, not wishful math.</strong> One of the most practical &#8220;buyer-grade&#8221; improvements is aligning sales compensation to as-delivered service gross margin dollars, not revenue or theoretical margins.</p>



<p>Why? Because sales affects margin before and after the contract through qualification, standards compliance, discount discipline, scope hygiene, and change orders.</p>



<p>Paying on as-delivered gross margin dollars forces the whole company to play the same game: sell what you can deliver profitably, defend scope, and protect standards. Buyers love this because it signals mature financial governance and fewer post-acquisition surprises.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What Quietly Destroys Valuation</strong></h2>



<p>Several patterns quietly erode what buyers are willing to pay.</p>



<p>Underpaying yourself to inflate profit doesn&#8217;t fool anyone. Buyers adjust it anyway.</p>



<p>Labor creep happens when headcount rises faster than productivity, causing margins to stagnate.</p>



<p>Founder-only sales and escalation creates key-person risk that kills multiples.</p>



<p>Exception culture, where you maintain snowflake clients and custom stacks, creates integration nightmares.</p>



<p>Having no pricing system and failing to raise prices routinely turns time into a slow-motion discount.</p>



<p>Weak forecasting, where you use &#8220;probability guessing&#8221; instead of stage-based pipeline math, makes the business feel unpredictable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Preparing for Diligence Like a Premium Business</strong></h2>



<p>Think of diligence as a demonstration of your operating system.</p>



<p>You should be ready to present a quality of earnings view with owner compensation normalized and one-time items clearly separated.</p>



<p>You should be able to show revenue durability through retention cohorts, concentration analysis, and renewal and expansion patterns.</p>



<p>You should have operating cadence artifacts: leadership agendas, quarterly review notes, and capacity planning rhythm.</p>



<p>You should have a standards roadmap that shows your stack, your versioning, and your onboarding compliance process.</p>



<p>You should demonstrate forecasting discipline through defined stages, weekly pipeline review, CRM rules, and actual conversion ratios.</p>



<p>The message you want buyers to absorb is simple: this business runs on routines, not heroics.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The Mindset Shift That Creates Value</strong></h2>



<p>Moving from owner-operator to CEO isn&#8217;t about bigger goals or longer hours. It&#8217;s about different work.</p>



<p>It means financial guardrails that force truth. A repeatable operating cadence. Leaders who own outcomes. Standards that eliminate chaos. Pricing discipline that protects the future. Forecasting and metrics that reduce uncertainty.</p>



<p>Buyers reward this because it reduces risk. But you benefit first: fewer fires, cleaner margins, stronger teams, and a business you can step away from without it collapsing.</p>



<p>That freedom, that optionality, is the real value multiplier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/what-makes-your-it-business-valuable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">742</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Design Incentives That Pay People for Real Profit</title>
		<link>https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/how-to-design-incentives-that-pay-people-for-real-profit/</link>
					<comments>https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/how-to-design-incentives-that-pay-people-for-real-profit/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 12:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Management]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/?p=722</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you run a managed service business, you don&#8217;t need another special bonus or feel-good incentive to change outcomes. You need an incentive plan that pays people to create the business you want: profitable, high-quality, durable growth.&#160; The shortest path is simple to say and powerful in practice: pay people based on the actual profit [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>If you run a managed service business, you don&#8217;t need another special bonus or feel-good incentive to change outcomes. You need an incentive plan that pays people to create the business you want: profitable, high-quality, durable growth.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The shortest path is simple to say and powerful in practice: pay people based on the actual profit dollars that show up in your financial statements, not on revenue or hoped-for profit.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Everything else like pricing discipline, better project planning, tighter standards, and healthier sales pipelines falls in line when compensation is wired to real profit that hits your books.</p>



<p>This article lays out the why, what, and how for incentive compensation that works in the real world, integrating price management, standards, presales, forecasting, and owner pay so you can scale profitably without compromising customer experience.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>First Principles: Align Pay with Predictable Profit</strong></h2>



<p>Incentives should reinforce the three levers that drive predictable profits in any business: a compelling model, capable people, and robust systems. Compensation is the bridge between people and systems. Done well, it moves behavior toward repeatable, systematic execution instead of heroics.</p>



<p>For managed service businesses specifically, that means four things. First, reward the profit you actually deliver. Sales influences real costs through who they sell to, how they set expectations, whether they insist on paid discovery, and how they defend scope and price. Pay them on actual delivered profit dollars and you&#8217;ll see the right behavior show up fast.</p>



<p>Second, protect price integrity with a system, not bravado. A disciplined, annual price increase action that applies to new and existing clients drives the profit dollars your incentive plan depends on without materially increasing customer loss.</p>



<p>Third, build incentives on top of standards and presales discipline. Selling your standard technology stack and charging for discovery raises profit percentage and quality. It also makes paying on actual delivered profit calculable and fair.</p>



<p>Fourth, tie leadership bonuses to budgeted profit, not &#8220;whatever&#8217;s left.&#8221; Owner and executive incentives should trigger on hitting the profit plan and be recorded in your financial statements, creating true alignment with shareholder value.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The Cornerstone: Pay Sales on Actually Delivered Service Profit Dollars</strong></h2>



<p><strong>What it means:</strong> Commissionable profit dollars equal service revenue minus actual service costs. Not revenue. Not assumed profit percentage. Not the statement of work fantasy. Real costs calculated from real time tracking.</p>



<p><strong>Why it works:</strong> When salespeople know their compensation rides on profit that actually lands in your financial statements, they start qualifying customers to your standards and refusing one-off technology requests. They start protecting scope and backing change orders. They start holding price instead of offering discounts. They start pushing paid discovery to get the project plan right.</p>



<p><strong>The math your team must see:</strong> Price a job for 40% profit margin on a 100 cost base. Price is roughly 167, profit dollars are 67. Cut price by 10% with cost unchanged. Price becomes 150, profit dollars become 50. A &#8220;small&#8221; 10% discount destroys roughly 25% of your profit dollars. Paying on actually delivered profit dollars makes that pain visible to the salesperson, not just the finance team.</p>



<p><strong>Target guardrail:</strong> Aim for at least 45% service profit percentage because services overhead typically runs around 30%. Below that, you&#8217;re taking payroll risk without adequate return.</p>



<p>Here&#8217;s a critical foundation: get your financial categories right so the numbers are trustworthy. Service payroll, both billed and unbilled, belongs in cost of goods sold. Break out each services line of business so you can compute profit accurately. Without this, any &#8220;as-delivered&#8221; plan will wobble.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Price Management: Incentivize and Normalize Price Integrity</strong></h2>



<p>Top performing providers raise prices every year for new and existing customers, with contract language that includes annual increases, then they limit exceptions to a tiny, distributed slice of revenue. When they do it systematically, roughly 99% of customers accept reasonable increases and win rates among new prospects don&#8217;t materially erode. Teams are often surprised by this, but the data and countless initiatives bear it out.</p>



<p>Inflation and input costs aren&#8217;t theoretical. If you didn&#8217;t move rates while costs rose year after year, you&#8217;ve effectively given clients a cumulative discount. That is not sustainable. It eventually degrades customer experience because you starve delivery of the resources it needs. Make annual increases part of the plan, and build sales incentives that reward holding the new price, not &#8220;saving&#8221; deals with discounts.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Standards Plus Presales: The Silent Engines of Higher Profit</strong></h2>



<p>You can&#8217;t pay on actually delivered profit dollars if your delivery cost is a moving target. Standards fix that. High maturity managed service businesses pick one technology stack per layer like endpoints, network, identity, backup, and cloud, then require compliance ideally at onboarding. If a prospect won&#8217;t standardize, it&#8217;s a pass. That single decision unlocks higher quality, faster training, more automation, lower spare parts inventory, stronger pricing power, and healthier profit to fund better pay.</p>



<p>Similarly, presales belongs in Services and should be paid work when doing scoping and assessments, with at least 50% profit margin. That move consistently leads to bigger, better-scoped deals sold at value and delivered at higher profit. It also reduces sales expense as a percentage of profit dollars because salespeople aren&#8217;t spraying proposals. They&#8217;re advancing qualified, standard-aligned opportunities.</p>



<p>Tie your incentive plan to these realities. Selling within standards earns normal commission. Exceptions require CEO approval and may reduce commission rate. Paid discovery is mandatory before fixed-fee statements of work with no &#8220;credit back.&#8221; Service leadership, not sales, approves any service discount until the culture resets.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Prospect Risk and Qualification: Pay to Win the Right Customers</strong></h2>



<p>Not all revenue is good revenue. Assessing the customer&#8217;s operational maturity early protects your team from less mature buyers who won&#8217;t honor scope, won&#8217;t standardize, and won&#8217;t support a healthy relationship. High performers use an operational maturity assessment, preferably paid, as both a qualifier and a differentiator. It shortens the path to managed services for the right clients. Compensation should reward pipeline quality, not just volume.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Owner and Executive Incentives: Pay from the Financial Statements and Tie to Plan</strong></h2>



<p>When an owner is also an executive, wear two hats: shareholder and operator. Pay them accordingly. Top performers record owner-as-executive compensation at fair market rates in the financial statements, then tie the incentive portion to attainment of the budgeted bottom-line profit, not vague profit sharing. This produces cleaner financials, aligns behavior with shareholder value, and avoids overstating earnings that crumble at valuation time.</p>



<p>Two practical implications for your incentive design. Executive bonuses trigger at threshold and scale with achievement against the budgeted profit, not simply &#8220;any profit.&#8221; Allocate owner and executive time across Sales costs, Service costs, and general overhead to measure true performance and decide when a non-owner leader can be hired to backfill.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Forecast-Driven Quotas and Payout Pacing</strong></h2>



<p>Revenue forecasting is not art. It&#8217;s a stage-based pipeline math exercise that your customer management system can support. Use stage definitions, conversion ratios, cycle times, and average deal values to produce a rolling forecast. Tie sales quotas and payout pacing to profit dollar targets that cascade from the plan, not just top-line revenue. As forecasting accuracy improves, your compensation accruals and cash flow become steadier, and so does delivery staffing.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The Plan: A Simple, Enforceable Compensation Model</strong></h2>



<p><strong>Commission bases:</strong> For services, the commissionable base is actually delivered profit dollars. For product sales, the commissionable base is product profit dollars, tracked separately.</p>



<p><strong>Rates as examples:</strong> Services profit dollar rate might be 17.5 to 20%. Product profit dollar rate might be 10 to 12.5%. Pay more for services to shift behavior toward sticky, high-margin offers. Roll changes in gradually unless you&#8217;re losing money.</p>



<p><strong>Discount control:</strong> No service discounting without CEO or Service leader approval. Sales leaders tend to discount more than Service would. Route pricing authority to the team accountable for delivery profit.</p>



<p><strong>Payout timing:</strong> For fixed-fee projects, pay milestones based on collected profit dollars. For example, 50% at accepted design plus actual costs to date, with balance at close using final actual costs. For ongoing monthly services, optionally pay roughly 50% of expected commission after the first collected month based on the estimate, then true up at month three to six once steady-state costs are known and continue monthly based on actual profit dollars.</p>



<p><strong>Non-negotiables to make it work:</strong> The plan requires 100% time entry in your management system with accurate roles and phases. Your financial categories and management system must align so labor, contractors, and allocable tools hit Service costs. Paid discovery is required before fixed-fee statements of work. Standards compliance is required with exceptions rare and CEO-approved.</p>



<p>A hiring note: use behavioral interviewing to surface qualities like price discipline, evidence-seeking, and comfort holding a line. Gut feeling is not a selection tool. Better hires make incentive systems work. Poor hires will try to game them.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Indicators to Track and Share</strong></h2>



<p>Track service profit percentage as actually delivered, targeting at least 45%. Watch sold versus actual profit percentage variance, shrinking to less than 5 percentage points. Monitor percentage of deals within standards and target customer profile, aiming for at least 90%. Track percentage of engagements with paid discovery, targeting at least 85%. Measure change order capture rate for approved versus requested, aiming for at least 90%. Watch sales compensation dollars per profit dollars generated, trending down over time, meaning more profit dollars per compensation dollar spent.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Questions Your Team Will Ask</strong></h2>



<p><strong>&#8220;Will we lose customers if we raise prices?&#8221;</strong> In disciplined, well-messaged programs, roughly 99% of customers accept reasonable increases, and win rates among new prospects are not materially affected. The very few departures are typically unprofitable relationships you shouldn&#8217;t keep. Normalize annual increases and make it part of how you do business.</p>



<p><strong>&#8220;Will operations suffer if sales stops discounting?&#8221;</strong> It improves. Standards reduce variants. Paid presales reduces surprises. Selling within your stack increases quality and predictability, exactly what Services needs to deliver flat-fee outcomes at healthy profit.</p>



<p><strong>&#8220;Isn&#8217;t paying on revenue simpler?&#8221;</strong> Yes, and it&#8217;s why profit margins sag. Revenue pay decouples compensation from the economics that keep your business alive. Paying on actually delivered profit dollars makes the invisible visible for everyone.</p>



<p><strong>&#8220;Can we just do profit sharing for leadership?&#8221;</strong> That blurs accountability. Tie owner and executive incentives to attainment of the budgeted profit, not &#8220;whatever&#8217;s left,&#8221; and record owner pay in the financial statements at fair market rates to keep the scoreboard honest.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Bringing It Together</strong></h2>



<p>High-performing managed service businesses don&#8217;t treat incentive compensation as a motivational poster. They treat it as part of the operating system. Standards narrow the playing field. Presales is paid and reports to Services. Price increases are annual and systematic. Pipelines are forecasted by stage, not hope. And everyone is paid for the profit that actually happens. Build those pieces and your compensation plan stops being a tug-of-war and starts being a flywheel that reinforces itself.</p>



<p>The plan is straightforward: pay people for the profit they actually help create, not the revenue they book or the profit they hope to create. Protect that profit with standards, paid discovery, and disciplined pricing. Make the numbers visible and trustworthy. Then watch as behavior shifts naturally toward the outcomes you want: sustainable growth, healthy relationships, and a team that understands their success is directly tied to the business&#8217;s real financial health.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/how-to-design-incentives-that-pay-people-for-real-profit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">722</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why À-la-Carte Bleeds Margin and What to Do Instead</title>
		<link>https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/why-a-la-carte-bleeds-margin-and-what-to-do-instead/</link>
					<comments>https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/why-a-la-carte-bleeds-margin-and-what-to-do-instead/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Management]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/?p=687</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If your services feel hard to sell, hard to staff, and even harder to keep profitable, the problem is probably your menu.&#160; Pick-and-choose offerings look friendly and flexible, but they quietly transfer risk from the buyer to you. Every exception creates variance. Variance complicates delivery. Complexity devours profit. The cure isn&#8217;t a shinier proposal template. [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>If your services feel hard to sell, hard to staff, and even harder to keep profitable, the problem is probably your menu.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Pick-and-choose offerings look friendly and flexible, but they quietly transfer risk from the buyer to you. Every exception creates variance. Variance complicates delivery. Complexity devours profit. The cure isn&#8217;t a shinier proposal template. It&#8217;s a different philosophy of packaging. Complete managed services with clear scope, standard technology, defined governance, and predictable pricing shift the engagement from &#8220;pieces of work&#8221; to &#8220;promises we keep,&#8221; and that shift is where profit, quality, and sanity live.</p>



<p>Here’s why pick-and-choose undermines outcomes, what &#8220;complete service&#8221; actually includes, how to price it without fear, and a practical plan to migrate customers without drama. Along the way we&#8217;ll connect the dots between packaging and the mechanics that keep a services company healthy: standardization, time discipline, cash flow, operational maturity, and executive governance. None of that is glamorous. All of it is what lets you scale with confidence.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Why Pick-and-Choose Loses Even When It Wins Deals</strong></h2>



<p>Pick-and-choose feels customer-centric because buyers can select what they want. In practice, it cements misalignment. The buyer optimizes for the lowest visible price while you inherit the invisible risks. Tools and processes can&#8217;t be standardized, so engineers constantly switch contexts and handoffs wobble. Oversight slips because no one can see the whole picture. Billing disputes rise because partial services produce partial outcomes. The account becomes a treadmill of &#8220;one more small thing,&#8221; and your most senior people end up rescuing the model rather than improving it.</p>



<p>The complete service mindset begins with an uncomfortable truth: reliable outcomes require consistent inputs. If you accept arbitrary tools, irregular maintenance, or fuzzy roles, you are selling hope. The most effective providers stop selling hope and start selling a system: a known technology stack, a hygiene rhythm, a governance calendar, and a response and resolution commitment backed by staffing and tools that are actually funded by the price.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What a Complete Service Package Really Includes</strong></h2>



<p>A complete service package is not a bloated bundle of line items. It&#8217;s a handful of interlocking commitments that turn services into a repeatable operating system.</p>



<p>First, a standard technology stack per layer of the environment. One monitoring and security approach, one backup method, one identity safeguard, one collaboration and security baseline. Standardization is the cornerstone because it cuts variance and enables expertise, automation, and scale. It&#8217;s how you turn &#8220;talented individual&#8221; into &#8220;competent team.&#8221;</p>



<p>Second, a governance schedule that customers can set their watch by. This includes a launch plan with stabilization and standardization tasks, monthly or twice-monthly operational check-ins, and a quarterly business review with decision-makers. The quarterly review isn&#8217;t a ticket recap. It&#8217;s the forum for risk posture, lifecycle refresh, roadmap, and budget. When governance is baked into the package, executives stay engaged and renewal is a non-event.</p>



<p>Third, a definition of done that survives personnel changes. Tickets close with time captured promptly and diagnostic documentation attached. Projects include validation steps. Incidents end with a short root cause note and pattern harvest. Documentation is short, searchable, and mandatory. Your package includes the discipline that makes the work auditable and billable.</p>



<p>Fourth, cash mechanics that keep oxygen in the tank. Managed services billed in advance. Projects progress-billed at meaningful milestones. Clear payment expectations at onboarding, with late-pay responses that escalate quickly from gentle reminder to prepayment requirement. It&#8217;s hard to deliver high-quality service on IOUs.</p>



<p>Finally, a pricing policy that is universal and unsurprising. Annual increase applied to new and existing customers. Exceptions are rare and approved by Service Team leadership because they live with the quality consequences. A complete service package is not a discount buffet. It&#8217;s a sustained investment in outcomes.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Design the Bundle from Outcomes Backward</strong></h2>



<p>Start with the customer&#8217;s real goals: reliable uptime, fast help when something breaks, fewer surprises, visible risk reduction, predictable spending. Then design backward to the minimum system required to guarantee those goals across many customers. That design is your complete service.</p>



<p>Scope should name the categories you own like endpoints, identity, data protection, and user support. It should spell out the hygiene you perform such as patching windows, alert reviews, and restore tests. It should define the response and resolution targets by severity and the governance rhythm. Spell out what&#8217;s excluded and how additional projects are proposed and approved. Your statement of work shouldn&#8217;t read like a parts list. It should read like a promise with a playbook.</p>



<p>Use the same principle for onboarding. Treat the first 60 to 90 days as a stabilization project with a published plan: inventory and discovery, gap-to-standard analysis, remediation and rollout in phases, and acceptance criteria. Standardize as much as humanly possible. The more you can pre-load tickets and tasks from templates, the faster you will reach your steady-state margin.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Price the Package Like an Operator, Not a Gambler</strong></h2>



<p>There are only three honest ways to set a price: match the market, price on cost, or price on value. Market matching is how less mature firms slowly go out of business because you end up imitating competitors who don&#8217;t know their costs or are buying market share. Cost-based pricing is the foundation: calculate fully loaded delivery cost per user, device, or site and target a profit margin that funds great service and still pays for growth. Value-based pricing is where you graduate when your offer is differentiated and your proof is strong.</p>



<p>Getting cost right means allocating real labor and tool costs to the practice and computing realized margin with actual time entries, not guesses. Many businesses discover that the true steady-state cost of a mature offering ends up close to double what they assumed at the beginning. That&#8217;s not failure. That&#8217;s learning. Your packaging and price must evolve with that learning or quality will collapse under thin margins.</p>



<p>For larger customers, resist the instinct to lower unit price. Complexity rises with size: governance, integration, security posture, account management, and compliance all get heavier. Bigger companies should not pay less per user for the same promise. They should pay more because the operating system you need to keep their promises costs more.</p>



<p>Finally, keep the commercial story simple. A per-user price aligned to how finance departments forecast is usually the cleanest unit, with clear additions for known, infrequent complexities. Avoid itemizing so deeply that buyers start &#8220;unbundling&#8221; the very pieces that make reliability possible.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Make Presales a Service Discipline</strong></h2>



<p>If your packaging is complete service, your presales must be too. Free-form, unpaid discovery leads to hopeful proposals and post-sale surprises. Treat assessment and design as paid consulting with a fixed deliverable the prospect keeps, whether or not they proceed. Use a standard method any trained assessor can execute. Document current state, risk, and the path to your standard. Include a preliminary governance calendar and a first-year project roadmap so the buyer sees the future you&#8217;re selling, not just the fee.</p>



<p>Crucially, presales should report into the Service organization or be governed by it. The people who live with the margin are the right people to approve exceptions. When presales is accountable to Service standards and costs, two things improve immediately: the promises sold match the promises deliverable, and more of the upfront work is paid rather than free.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Standardization Isn&#8217;t Stubborn, It&#8217;s Safety</strong></h2>



<p>The hardest part of moving to a complete service model is learning to say &#8220;no&#8221; to exceptions that break your system. That doesn&#8217;t mean inflexibility. It means insisting that exceptions have owners, expiration dates, and a path to remediation. &#8220;We&#8217;ll run that legacy firewall for ninety days while we phase in the standard&#8221; is very different from &#8220;we&#8217;ll support anything you&#8217;ve got.&#8221;</p>



<p>Standardization accelerates everything: training, troubleshooting, automation, security posture, and even sales velocity. Over time, customers experience fewer outages and faster resolutions. Engineers spend more time improving the system and less time inventing workarounds. The business spends less money on scattered tools and more on deep competence where it counts.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Govern the Relationship So It Never Drifts</strong></h2>



<p>A complete service package lives or dies by its governance rhythm. Put the quarterly business review on the calendar at contract signature and protect it. Prepare like it matters: risk dashboard, lifecycle plan with spending forecast, indicator trends for responsiveness and delivery success, and a simple narrative that connects investment to outcomes. The quarterly review is where scope is reset, projects are sequenced, and value is made obvious to the executive who signs the renewal.</p>



<p>Make payment behavior visible in governance too. Payment collection time creeping beyond about a month is a relationship signal as much as a finance metric. When you surface it early, you can fix the friction like unclear invoices, scope confusion, or perceived value gaps before it hardens into customer loss.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Teach Your Service Desk to Carry the Promise</strong></h2>



<p>Packaging fails if the service desk runs on heroics instead of habits. Complete service offerings need a front line that can predictably absorb demand, route correctly, and resolve cleanly.</p>



<p>Give Dispatch authority and standards. Intake triage, severity and service level clock, the &#8220;fast lane&#8221; for true priority-one emergencies, and a short list of documentation required before escalation. Make reassignments a metric you watch. High reassignments mean your pattern matching or role clarity is off.</p>



<p>Treat Escalation as the guardian of safety and learning, not just the emergency team. When a fix reveals a pattern, it should produce a procedure entry, a monitoring rule, a standardization task, or a change proposal. The goal isn&#8217;t to be clever. It&#8217;s to make tomorrow quieter than today.</p>



<p>Hold the line on ticket quality. Time captured promptly, descriptive notes, and validation steps are not paperwork. They are the data that make the business predictable. Accurate time and documentation reduce billing disputes, reveal bottlenecks, and let you staff correctly. In a complete service world, &#8220;definition of done&#8221; is a profit lever.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Communicate the Change Without Apology</strong></h2>



<p>Customers do not buy parts. They buy outcomes and predictability. When you migrate from pick-and-choose to complete service, explain the &#8220;why&#8221; in those terms. A standard stack and hygiene rhythm are what make your response times reliable and your security posture strong. Governance is how they get executive control and budget visibility. Upfront billing is what keeps your team staffed and tools current so incidents are rare and short. Pricing discipline is how you avoid underfunding the engine they rely on.</p>



<p>Be specific and warm. Offer three respectful options when someone can&#8217;t accept the change today: adjust scope without undercutting reliability, phase the rollout, or use financing to smooth cash flow. What you cannot do is erode the standards and still promise the same outcomes. That isn&#8217;t stubbornness. It&#8217;s honesty.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Migrate Your Base in Waves, Not All at Once</strong></h2>



<p>Legacy pick-and-choose relationships won&#8217;t transform overnight. Plan a phased migration with clear criteria and a visible scoreboard.</p>



<p>Start with fit, friendly customers who already value your approach. Move them to the complete service package with a crisp assessment, a remediation plan, and a &#8220;day-one&#8221; governance calendar. Capture quick wins and testimonials about fewer tickets, faster response, and calmer operations.</p>



<p>Tackle complex accounts next with a formal standardization project. Publish the gap list, negotiate the exceptions with expiration dates, and report progress in quarterly reviews. Expect pushback from pockets of the business that prize autonomy over reliability. Hold the line, demonstrate the improvement, and keep moving.</p>



<p>Leave chronic misfits for last and be willing to part respectfully (or you can refer them to your competitor). The rare customer who refuses standardization, governance, or payment norms is telling you they want a different kind of relationship than you offer. Thank them, help them transition cleanly, and use the freed capacity to serve aligned customers better.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Measure the Right Things, Visibly and Simply</strong></h2>



<p>A great package still needs proof. Pick a small set of indicators that confirm you&#8217;re keeping promises and track them weekly. First response time tied to service level targets. Time to resolution percentiles. Delivery success as a simple ratio. Backlog age and reopen rate. Quarterly reviews held with decision-makers. Payment collection time relative to a 30-day target. Realized profit margin by customer and by offering.</p>



<p>Make the dashboards easy to read at a glance and close to the work, not buried in quarterly presentations. Use them to diagnose and improve, not to punish. When a line bends the wrong way, treat it as a system problem first: capacity, standardization gaps, broken handoffs, or unclear scope. Then fix the system and teach the fix.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Align Incentives So the Model Sticks</strong></h2>



<p>Packaging is culture in disguise. If Sales compensation rewards volume regardless of deliverability, you&#8217;ll drift back to pick-and-choose chaos. If discount approval sits with someone who doesn&#8217;t own service quality, price discipline will crumble. Move presales under Service guardrails. Route discount and scope exceptions to the leaders who live with the margin. Recognize and reward adherence like quiet, uneventful launches, zero-drama patch windows, and clean audits so the organization values calm outcomes over flashy heroics.</p>



<p>Internally, publish prices and teach the story behind them. When everyone from sellers to schedulers understands the economics, they stop apologizing for sustainable pricing and start defending it.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The Quiet Payoff of the Complete Service Model</strong></h2>



<p>From the outside, complete managed services look boring. Customers call, you respond, problems get fixed, projects land roughly when you said they would, executives show up to reviews, invoices get paid on time, and renewals &#8220;just happen.&#8221; Behind that calm surface is a machine: standardized tools, repeatable methods, disciplined time and cash tracking, and a governance schedule that keeps the future in view. The profit shows up not as a single big win, but as a hundred small leaks that never appear.</p>



<p>The ultimate test is how the business behaves on a random Tuesday when two engineers are out and a vendor pushes a critical patch. In a pick-and-choose shop, that&#8217;s the day the model cracks. In a complete service shop, the system absorbs the shock: Dispatch routes, Escalation leads, the procedures are current, the stack is known, and the quarterly review next week will fund the improvement you learned today. That is what you are packaging. Not parts. Not promises without a plan. A system that keeps its word this week, next quarter, and next year, profitably.</p>



<p>If you change the menu, you change the business. Move from pick-and-choose to complete service, and you will feel complexity recede, predictability rise, and margin become a management choice rather than a mystery. Customers won&#8217;t miss the old menu. They&#8217;ll appreciate that dinner arrives hot, correct, and on time, and that there&#8217;s always a seat waiting next time they come back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/why-a-la-carte-bleeds-margin-and-what-to-do-instead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">687</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Simple Guide to MSP Pricing (That Actually Works)</title>
		<link>https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/a-simple-guide-to-msp-pricing-that-actually-works/</link>
					<comments>https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/a-simple-guide-to-msp-pricing-that-actually-works/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 09:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales & Marketing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/?p=600</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the truth: most Managed Service Providers (MSPs) set prices by guessing what competitors charge. That&#8217;s why they struggle with thin profits and unpredictable income. The better way? Know your actual costs, understand your value, make buying decisions simple, and raise prices regularly. Think of pricing as a system you build once, then maintain—not just [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Here&#8217;s the truth: most Managed Service Providers (MSPs) set prices by guessing what competitors charge. That&#8217;s why they struggle with thin profits and unpredictable income.</p>



<p>The better way? Know your actual costs, understand your value, make buying decisions simple, and raise prices regularly. Think of pricing as a system you build once, then maintain—not just a number you pick and hope works.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Step 1: Know What Things Actually Cost You</strong></h2>



<p>You can&#8217;t price well if you don&#8217;t know what it costs to deliver your service.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The math seems simple but most people get it wrong.</p>



<p>Here&#8217;s the wrong way: Take a technician&#8217;s $50,000 salary, divide by 2,080 hours (a full work year), and mark it up a bit. Seems logical, right?&nbsp;</p>



<p>The problem is this ignores health insurance, payroll taxes, software tools, training time, vacation days, and the fact that nobody bills 100% of their hours. When a technician is in team meetings, doing paperwork, or waiting for a customer to respond, those are hours you&#8217;re paying for but not billing for.</p>



<p>The right way involves understanding the full picture.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Successful MSPs aim to bring in at least $2.50 in revenue for every $1 they pay in wages. So if you pay someone $50,000, you need them generating at least $125,000 in revenue.&nbsp;</p>



<p>This 2.5× rule accounts for all those hidden costs and ensures healthy profit margins. When you hit this target consistently, you&#8217;ll have enough left over to cover your office rent, your own salary, marketing costs, insurance, and still have money left for growth and savings.</p>



<p>Think about it this way: if you&#8217;re paying your technicians but barely breaking even at the end of the month, something is fundamentally wrong with your pricing.&nbsp;</p>



<p>You&#8217;re essentially running a charity, not a business.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The 2.5× rule gives you a clear target to aim for.</p>



<p>Here are some questions you need honest answers to. At your current prices, can you afford to pay your team well? This matters because good technicians don&#8217;t stay at companies that underpay them.&nbsp;</p>



<p>How many billable hours can you realistically expect per technician?&nbsp;</p>



<p>Hint: It&#8217;s not 40 hours a week. Factor in training, administrative work, team meetings, and downtime between projects. Most healthy MSPs plan for around 30 or more billable hours per technician per week, not 40.</p>



<p>If you need to hire senior, expensive experts, will customers pay rates high enough to cover them? This is a crucial question. If you can&#8217;t afford expensive senior people at your current prices, you need a different team structure.&nbsp;</p>



<p>You need more junior technicians doing most of the work, with just a few experts supervising and handling the complex problems. This pyramid structure is how most successful service companies operate.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The expensive experts aren&#8217;t in the trenches all day—they&#8217;re guiding the team and solving the hardest problems.</p>



<p>The trap many business owners fall into is being too optimistic about utilization. They imagine their technicians will be busy every minute, but the reality includes gaps between appointments, time spent documenting work, internal meetings, and training on new technologies.&nbsp;</p>



<p>When you factor in vacation time, sick days, and holidays, a technician working a full year might only have 1,800 truly available hours, not 2,080.&nbsp;</p>



<p>And of those 1,800 hours, maybe only 1,400 are actually billable to customers. This is why the simple salary-divided-by-hours math fails so badly.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Step 2: Price for the Value You Deliver, Not Just Your Costs</strong></h2>



<p>Once you know your minimum viable price (your &#8220;floor&#8221;), you can charge more based on the value you provide. This is where many MSPs leave massive amounts of money on the table.</p>



<p>Great MSPs don&#8217;t just &#8220;match what others charge.&#8221; They price based on what they&#8217;re worth to the customer. Think about what you&#8217;re really delivering. You&#8217;re providing risk transfer, meaning you&#8217;re taking on the stress and liability of their technology. When their email server crashes at 2 AM, that&#8217;s your problem, not theirs. That peace of mind has real value.&nbsp;</p>



<p>You&#8217;re also delivering productivity gains because their team works better when systems actually work reliably. Nobody can work effectively when they&#8217;re fighting with their computer all day. And you&#8217;re providing scalability, meaning they can grow their business without technology disasters derailing everything.</p>



<p>Here&#8217;s something most MSPs learn the hard way: when you launch a new service offering, you&#8217;ll always underestimate the real cost.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Most companies discover a pattern. Their initial estimate is &#8220;This will cost us X to deliver.&#8221; Then after 20-30 customers, reality hits: &#8220;Oh, this actually costs us twice what we thought—2X.&#8221; Finally, at maturity, when they&#8217;re doing it really well and consistently, they realize &#8220;To do this properly takes three times our original estimate—3X.&#8221;</p>



<p>Smart companies learn from others&#8217; mistakes. They price at 3X from day one and save themselves years of losing money while &#8220;learning.&#8221;&nbsp;</p>



<p>Yes, this might mean your prices are higher than some competitors when you launch something new, but you&#8217;ll actually make money while they&#8217;re bleeding cash and wondering why their &#8220;profitable&#8221; new service is bankrupting them.</p>



<p>Here&#8217;s another counterintuitive truth: don&#8217;t discount for bigger customers.&nbsp;</p>



<p>It seems logical at first. A company with 200 employees should pay less per person than a company with 20 employees, right? Wrong. It&#8217;s actually backwards, and here&#8217;s why.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Bigger customers usually need more sophisticated tools, more experienced technicians, more account management time, and more careful coordination. Your cost per user goes up with bigger accounts, so your price should too.</p>



<p>Think about the difference between supporting a 10-person startup where everyone uses the same basic setup versus a 200-person company with multiple departments, remote workers, compliance requirements, and a CFO who wants detailed reporting.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The 200-person company is dramatically more complex to support. You might need dedicated account management, formal quarterly business reviews, more sophisticated monitoring tools, and technicians who can handle enterprise-level challenges.&nbsp;</p>



<p>All of that costs more, not less.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Step 3: Make Buying Simple</strong></h2>



<p>Don&#8217;t give customers a menu of 47 service options.&nbsp;</p>



<p>It paralyzes them and leads to bad choices that hurt your margins. When you present too many options, customers focus on finding the cheapest possible combination rather than thinking about what they actually need.</p>



<p>A better approach is to offer one comprehensive service package with clear scope. Let customers think in simple terms: $X per employee per month for complete IT support, or $Y per month for their whole company.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The detailed breakdown lives in the contract (so you can adjust when they add people), but the buying decision is simple: &#8220;Do you want your technology managed well? Here&#8217;s the price.&#8221;</p>



<p>This simplicity benefits everyone. Customers can make faster decisions because they&#8217;re not trying to figure out whether they need the silver plan with extra backup or the gold plan with faster response time.&nbsp;</p>



<p>They&#8217;re just deciding whether they want comprehensive IT support or not. Your sales process gets faster too. Instead of spending hours customizing quotes and going back and forth on which services to include, you&#8217;re having a straightforward conversation about whether you&#8217;re the right fit for their needs.</p>



<p>The detailed units still matter, but they belong in the contract, not the sales pitch.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The contract specifies things like &#8220;includes up to 50 users, 50 computers, 5 servers&#8221; so you can cleanly handle adds and removals. But during the sales conversation, you&#8217;re focused on outcomes: &#8220;Your team will have reliable technology, fast support when things break, proactive monitoring to prevent problems, and the security protection your business needs.&#8221;</p>



<p>When it comes to hourly pricing, avoid it when possible. &#8220;Call us and we&#8217;ll bill you by the hour&#8221; creates unpredictable income for you and scary surprise bills for customers. Neither party benefits from this arrangement.&nbsp;</p>



<p>You can&#8217;t forecast your revenue, and customers are afraid to call you for help because they don&#8217;t know what it will cost.</p>



<p>If you must do hourly work, sell prepaid blocks like &#8220;20 hours for $3,000&#8221; that expire if unused and auto-renew monthly. This gives you predictable recurring revenue and gives customers predictable expenses.&nbsp;</p>



<p>But recognize that this is still less stable than managed services where customers pay the same amount every month regardless of how much support they need. Managed services is where you want most of your revenue to come from.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Step 4: Raise Prices Every Year (Yes, Really)</strong></h2>



<p>If your prices don&#8217;t go up annually, your service quality will quietly decline. This isn&#8217;t optional, it&#8217;s mathematical reality.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Here&#8217;s why it matters: Your team expects raises, and they should get them. If you want to keep good technicians, you need to pay them more this year than last year. Health insurance costs rise, recently by 5% to 10% or more annually. Software tools get more expensive.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Microsoft, your monitoring tools, your security stack—they all increase prices regularly. And everything costs more due to inflation. Your office rent, your internet connection, even your coffee for the break room costs more this year than last year.</p>



<p>If your revenue per customer stays flat while all your costs increase, the math only works one way: your profit margin shrinks.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Eventually you reach a breaking point where you either have to cut corners (hurting service quality), underpay your team (losing good people), or work twice as hard just to stay in the same place financially.</p>



<p>What great companies do is build automatic annual price increases into 90% of their contracts, typically 2% to 5% per year. This isn&#8217;t sneaky or aggressive. It&#8217;s just keeping pace with the reality that costs increase over time.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Every other vendor your customers use does this. Their office lease goes up, their insurance premiums increase, their suppliers raise prices. It&#8217;s normal business.</p>



<p>Here&#8217;s what you&#8217;re probably thinking right now: &#8220;We&#8217;ll lose customers if we raise prices!&#8221; This fear is so common and so overblown.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Here&#8217;s what actually happens: almost everyone accepts reasonable increases without complaint. The few who push back can usually be retained with a conversation about the value you provide. And the very rare customers who actually leave are usually your most difficult, least profitable customers anyway.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Your team will actually be relieved to see them go.</p>



<p>One IT company owner told me he lost sleep for weeks before announcing a 5% price increase to existing customers. He drafted careful emails explaining the increase, prepared detailed justifications, and braced for an onslaught of complaints and cancellations.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Out of 40 customers, 38 didn&#8217;t even respond to the email—they just accepted it. One called to say &#8220;that&#8217;s fine, thanks for letting us know.&#8221; And one complained but ultimately stayed anyway.&nbsp;</p>



<p>All that anxiety for nothing.</p>



<p>The key is making it normal, not dramatic. Put the escalator in the contract from day one so new customers know it&#8217;s coming. Treat it as routine business, not a big negotiation.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Send a simple notification 60 days before it takes effect: &#8220;As outlined in our agreement, your monthly rate will increase by 3% starting in March, from $5,000 to $5,150. This helps us continue delivering excellent service as our costs for tools, insurance, and talent continue to rise.&#8221;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Step 5: Run Pricing Like a Business System</strong></h2>



<p>Great pricing isn&#8217;t a one-time decision.&nbsp;</p>



<p>It&#8217;s an ongoing process that you build into how your company operates.</p>



<p>Start by giving pricing authority to the right people. Your service delivery team, not your sales team, should own pricing. Why? Because they actually deliver the work, they know the real costs, and they care about profitability, not just closing deals. Salespeople are optimists.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Their job is to see the possibility in every deal and find ways to yes.&nbsp;</p>



<p>That&#8217;s valuable, but it makes them terrible at pricing discipline.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Service managers, on the other hand, are the ones who have to deliver on the promises, so they&#8217;re naturally more realistic about what things actually cost.</p>



<p>Make discounts rare and require approval from service management. When salespeople can discount freely, they will, because it makes their job easier. But each discount comes out of your profit margin.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Over time, if you require approval for every discount and make the approval process slightly uncomfortable, your team will stop expecting to discount at all.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Discounting stops being &#8220;normal&#8221; and becomes the rare exception for truly strategic situations.</p>



<p>You also need to track what matters.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Know your profit per customer, not just your revenue.</p>



<p>A $10,000 per month customer who requires constant hand-holding and generates only $1,500 in profit is worse than a $5,000 per month customer who runs smoothly and generates $2,500 in profit.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Revenue is a vanity metric, profit is what actually matters.</p>



<p>Forecast six months ahead. Plan for hiring and spending based on expected profit, not guesses. If you know you&#8217;re adding $50,000 in monthly recurring revenue over the next quarter, and you know your target profit margins, you can calculate exactly how much you can afford to spend on hiring another technician or investing in better tools.</p>



<p>Review your numbers monthly.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Are you hitting your profit targets? If not, adjust quickly. Don&#8217;t wait until the end of the year to discover you&#8217;ve been unprofitable for months. Monthly reviews let you catch problems early when they&#8217;re small and fixable.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Maybe you need to tighten up your processes to work more efficiently. Maybe you need to have tough conversations with customers who are consuming way more time than expected.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Maybe you need to pause hiring until revenue catches up.</p>



<p>When presenting prices to potential customers, talk about outcomes, not itemized lists. Don&#8217;t say &#8220;3 server check-ins per month, 47 desktop monitors, 2 on-site visits, unlimited phone support.&#8221; That invites customers to question each line item and try to negotiate removing pieces to save money. Instead say &#8220;Your technology will be reliable, secure, and supported.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Your team can focus on their work instead of fighting with their computers. When something breaks, we fix it fast. And we proactively prevent problems before they impact your business.&#8221;</p>



<p>Save the detailed units for the contract itself, where they help manage adds and removals smoothly.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The contract might specify &#8220;50 users, 50 workstations, 5 servers&#8221; so everyone&#8217;s clear about what&#8217;s included and you can easily adjust when they hire more people or add servers.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>A Real-World Example</strong></h2>



<p>Let&#8217;s make this concrete. A 25-person company signs up for your standard IT support plan. Your calculations show you&#8217;ll spend about 1 hour per employee per month on support, plus device management and quarterly business reviews.&nbsp;</p>



<p>With all your costs factored in—technician wages, benefits, software tools, your overhead—you charge $150 per person per month. That&#8217;s $3,750 monthly or $45,000 annually from this client.</p>



<p>At that price, you&#8217;re hitting your target margins. After paying your technicians, covering software costs, and accounting for management time, you have healthy profit left over.</p>



<p>Three months in, their CFO asks for a detailed breakdown of exactly what they&#8217;re paying for. This is a test of your positioning.&nbsp;</p>



<p>You politely but firmly explain: &#8220;We sell outcomes and results, not itemized tasks. You&#8217;re paying for reliable technology, fast support, and the peace of mind that comes from having experts managing your systems. But your contract does show per-person pricing so we can smoothly add or remove people as you grow.&#8221;</p>



<p>Most CFOs accept this because it&#8217;s actually reasonable.&nbsp;</p>



<p>They don&#8217;t itemize their payments to their lawyer or accountant either.&nbsp;</p>



<p>They pay for expertise and results.</p>



<p>At renewal time, your automatic 2.5% increase applies. The price goes from $150 to $153.75 per person. You send a brief notification, and they accept it without discussion. No drama, no negotiation, no stress.</p>



<p>Six months in, you notice two customers are taking more time than expected. Maybe they&#8217;re less organized, maybe their previous IT setup was worse than you realized, or maybe they&#8217;re just higher-maintenance personalities. You have two levers to pull. First, you tighten up your processes to get more efficient.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Maybe you implement better documentation so tickets get resolved faster, or you do some training with their team to reduce repetitive questions. Second, for work that falls outside the normal scope—like a network redesign or a migration project—you propose a small project add-on at additional cost.</p>



<p>The system works because it&#8217;s a system. You&#8217;re not guessing and hoping each month. You have a process.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The Payoff</strong></h2>



<p>When you run pricing as a system—knowing costs, charging for value, keeping it simple, raising prices regularly, and managing it tightly—you get more predictable income, better profits without working harder, less stress and volatility, the ability to pay your team well, and customers who value what you do.</p>



<p>The difference between companies that struggle and companies that thrive often isn&#8217;t dramatic. It&#8217;s not about working twice as hard or being twice as smart.&nbsp;</p>



<p>It&#8217;s about doing these basics consistently, measuring what matters, and making small improvements that compound over time.</p>



<p>You don&#8217;t need to be perfect.&nbsp;</p>



<p>You just need to treat pricing like the business system it is, rather than a number you guessed and hoped would work.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Build the system once, maintain it monthly, and let it compound. That&#8217;s how ordinary MSPs become quietly, sustainably profitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/a-simple-guide-to-msp-pricing-that-actually-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">600</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Focus on Profit Growth First, Sales Growth Later</title>
		<link>https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/focus-on-profit-growth-first-sales-growth-later/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 11:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Management]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/?p=499</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What is the best way to build the value of your MSP? It’s not what you might think. First, let’s debunk a common misconception: that the best way to increase your MSP’s value is to grow your top line of sales aggressively. If this is your plan, pause now! Hear us out on why focusing [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="thrv_wrapper tve_wp_shortcode">
<div class="tve_shortcode_raw" style="display: none"></div>
<div class="tve_shortcode_rendered">
<p>What is the <em>best </em>way to build the value of your MSP? It’s not what you might think.</p>
</p>
<p>First, let’s debunk a common misconception: that the best way to increase your MSP’s value is to grow your top line of sales aggressively. If this is your plan, pause now! Hear us out on why focusing on your profit margin <em>first</em> is a better strategy (by a long shot).</p>
</p>
<p>We’ll let you in on some hard-earned wisdom: pushing your top line will only work if your MSP is already operating at a high level of profitability. The fact is, an MSP achieving high revenue but a low EBITDA % holds far less value than an MSP with <em>lower</em> revenue but a <em>higher</em> EBITDA %. That’s because the market favors a high EBITDA % as THE key indicator of an MSP’s ability to create and sustain profits into the future.</p>
</p>
<p>Attempting to rapidly grow your MSP’s sales without first fixing your profit margin is like putting water into a leaky bucket. It demands high investment and a dangerous potential for failure, creating an unacceptable (and unnecessary) risk of destructive financial and operational issues.</p>
</p>
<p>The good news? <em>There’s a better way.</em></p>
</p>
<p>The proven best way to build your MSP’s long-term value at a low risk is to build or fix your <strong>profitability first</strong>. Then, you can build incremental revenues.</p>
</p>
<p>We’ll tell you why. Here is how buyers are valuing your MSP (and, by the way, how you should be thinking about your business, too):</p>
</p>
<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li style="list-style-type: none;">
<ol>
<li><strong>Revenue </strong>&#8211; All else being equal, an MSP with high revenue is more valuable than an MSP with low revenue. Nothing shocking here, but don’t be fooled into focusing on the obvious.</li>
</ol>
</li>
</ol>
</p>
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: none;">
<ol>
<li><strong>Profitability</strong> &#8211; All else being equal, an MSP with a high EBITDA % is more valuable than an MSP with the same revenue but a low EBITDA %. Buyers want to invest in growing your MSP, not fixing it. If your profit margins aren’t up to par, buyers see your business as a chore rather than an opportunity.</li>
</ol>
</li>
</ol>
</p>
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: none;">
<ol>
<li><strong>Growth Potential </strong>&#8211; An MSP that doesn’t need investment in order to increase profitability can grow faster. Strong margins allow your profits to fund your future growth strategy, rather than additional outside capital. Low profit companies just consume cash. Here’s an example: MSPs with proven sales &amp; marketing strategies can turn the dial to maximize growth at any time; an MSP that requires investment to build up a sales strategy has a lower value.</li>
</ol>
</li>
</ol>
</p>
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: none;">
<ol>
<li><strong>Scalability</strong> &#8211; An MSP’s ability to absorb growth without a negative impact on profits has a high value. If automation and efficiency-enhancing technologies are already in place<em>,</em> buyers don’t have to invest in them.</li>
</ol>
</li>
</ol>
</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-649 size-full" src="https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/SURVIVAL-22.png" alt="" width="1200" height="628" srcset="https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/SURVIVAL-22.png 1200w, https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/SURVIVAL-22-300x157.png 300w, https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/SURVIVAL-22-1024x536.png 1024w, https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/SURVIVAL-22-768x402.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /></p>
<p>In short: if looking at your business model is like looking at a to-do list, it won’t be valued highly. </p>
</p>
<p>So, why not fix it all at once?</p>
</p>
<p>Unfortunately, it is <em>impossible</em> to rapidly grow revenue and fix profitability at the same time.</p>
</p>
<p>(Let us be clear: here at MSP Growth Solutions, we’re talking about best-in-class EBITDA %, in the 20% range. We believe our clients can achieve more than the median.)</p>
</p>
<p>Here’s why it doesn’t work: In order to rapidly grow revenue, there must be significant investment in sales &amp; marketing. That’s a fact. And it takes <em>time</em> for this investment to generate incremental revenues. During this time, there will be inevitable added expenses that are not yet offset by new revenues, as gross margins will be less than optimal for a while.</p>
</p>
<p>On top of that, you will need additional headcount. Low gross margin operations require more staff than high gross margin operations, and as we all know, it is difficult and expensive to recruit and train high quality technical talent. You will spend time, effort, and money hiring technicians into an inefficient operation that will soon need a policy and practice overhaul in order to increase profits, anyways!</p>
</p>
<p>If you try to do it all at once, you will create a cycle of pouring unnecessary financial investments into a broken system. You can’t focus on fixing your profit margins if you’re too busy training an overload of staff in outdated operations!</p>
</p>
<p>Now that you know what <em>not </em>to do, we can tell you about the ideal way to make your MSP valuable:</p>
</p>
<p> <strong>Fix Profitability First.</strong></p>
</p>
<p>Fixing your margins first allows you to put scalable processes and technology-driven efficiencies in place <em>before </em>your staff is grown, saving you tons of time wasted and decreasing your need for additional labor.</p>
</p>
<p>Maintaining a singular focus on improving profitability will drive results quicker, generating reliable, incremental gross margin dollars that can be reinvested to drive revenue growth in the future (remember: generating investable profits saves buyers from coughing up more cash!).</p>
</p>
<p>And profitability-focused sales &amp; marketing strategy lays a strong foundation for dialing up and pushing revenue down the line.</p>
</p>
<p>At the end of the day, by prioritizing profitability first, both total investment and overall risk are significantly lowered while growing your MSP. </p>
</p>
<p>We know this works. But don’t just take our word for it; see it for yourself in this comparison of two real MSPs. One focused on rapid sales growth, and the other followed our profitability-first method. Again, this model is based on <em>real</em> experiences with two MSPs with the same base year revenues, gross margin, and net income. Valuations are based on real and recent industry transaction history.</p>
</p>
</p>
<p>The numbers speak for themselves! The MSP that focused solely on profitability wins consistently and significantly higher valuations than the MSP that focused on revenue growth. It took <em>nine years </em>for the revenue-focused MSP to catch up in valuation. We know you don’t have nine years to waste, and neither do we.</p>
</p>
<p>Achieve high valuation, quickly and reliably, with a profitability focus.</p>
</p>
<p>That&#8217;s quite a bit to digest, but if you made it this far, we’re confident we’ve gotten you on board with our profitability-first approach. And we won’t leave you hanging! Stick around to see our upcoming posts about how this method works in practice.</p>
</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="tcb_flag" style="display: none"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">499</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Fire Your Customer</title>
		<link>https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/how-to-fire-your-customer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 09:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Management]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/?p=487</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We hear it all the time: “The customer is always right.” It’s a service principle that we’ve all been told over and over again but that isn’t actually true. Of course, it is our responsibility as service providers to listen to and address our customers’ needs. But some customers aren’t always right. And sometimes, those [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="thrv_wrapper tve_wp_shortcode">
<div class="tve_shortcode_raw" style="display: none"></div>
<div class="tve_shortcode_rendered">
<p>We hear it all the time: “The customer is always right.” It’s a service principle that we’ve all been told over and over again but that isn’t actually true.</p>
<p>Of course, it is our responsibility as service providers to listen to and address our customers’ needs. But some customers aren’t always right. And sometimes, those customers end up draining our time, energy, money, and resources for very little profit in return. Odds are, the customer you have in mind right now is dragging your business’ growth.</p>
<p>The challenge you are facing is that<strong> you don’t want to give up a client!</strong></p>
<p>This is understandable; customers are already hard to come by, and the thought of willingly giving up business induces fear… fear of burning a bridge, fear of losing revenue, fear of confrontation. But fear often gets in the way of good judgment, so it is worth taking a step back and considering this issue more logically.</p>
<p>In order to maximize your business’ potential, it is necessary to give constant attention to the quality and reliability of your customer base. By periodically reviewing and categorizing all of your clients and taking the subsequent, necessary action, you can guarantee happy customers, happy employees, and better business.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-653 size-full" src="https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/SURVIVAL-24.png" alt="" width="1200" height="628" srcset="https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/SURVIVAL-24.png 1200w, https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/SURVIVAL-24-300x157.png 300w, https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/SURVIVAL-24-1024x536.png 1024w, https://mspgrowthsolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/SURVIVAL-24-768x402.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /></p>
<p>This system works by identifying where each of your clients fall on the following grading scale:</p>
<ul>
<li>A &#8211; A customers are your ideal clients who are actively referring other prospects to you (typically other A customers). They are the 20% of your customer base who are likely driving 80% of your profits.</li>
<li>B &#8211; B customers are your steady, good customers who are satisfied, who pay their bills on time, and who are enjoyable to work with. Ideally, the bulk of your customer base is comprised of B customers.</li>
<li>C &#8211; C customers are those who need improvement. Perhaps they don’t pay their bills on time, or perhaps they are somewhat difficult to work with. They’re not the worst, but they’re certainly not your dream clients.</li>
<li>D &#8211; D customers are the ones who keep you up at night. They might be needy, a pain to work with, late to pay their bills, unprofitable, or causing noticeable aggravation amongst your team. They are the 20% of your customer base who are driving 80% of your headaches. D customers are likely to undervalue or undermine your service &#8211; a D customer isn’t always right.</li>
</ul>
</p>
<p>In order to know where each of your customers fall on this scale, you’ll need to come up with a set of criteria against which you can compare them. These criteria can include any client qualities, broad or specific to your business, that you feel are relevant. Questions worth considering include:</p>
<ul>
<li> Do they pay on time?</li>
<li>Are they easy to work with?</li>
<li>Do you enjoy your meetings with them?</li>
<li>Do they refer other customers?</li>
<li>Are they profitable for you?</li>
<li>Are they trainable to a point of profitability?</li>
</ul>
<p>On an annual basis, take the time to review each client according to these criteria. After discussion, assign each client a grade, A through D. There are no half grades allowed; for the purposes of this exercise, you cannot give any client a C plus or a B minus. Once you have given everyone a grade, you can take action.</p>
<p>The first action is, for many, the most difficult: <strong>remove D customers</strong> from your business.</p>
<p>Here are the facts about removing D customers: if they aren’t trainable, you are better off without them, despite your fear of losing revenue. By pruning off D customers, you are creating more time and space for the customers who deserve your attention. And in turn, your margins will improve; by removing low-margin customers from your average, your overall margin will rise. Remember, removing revenue does not equate to hurting your margins, and your gross<br />margins are the key indicator of the value of your business.</p>
<p>If it eases the process for you, you can always refer your D customers to another business who can better serve them according to their buying criteria. They are likely more suited to a business that provides less attentive service at a lower price. You don’t have to be everything for everyone. And remember: losing revenue is not always a bad thing.</p>
<p>You will be left with A, B, and C clients. The next step is to<strong> retrain C customers</strong> in an effort to convert them into A customers. This may involve reestablishing your expectations or sharing how they can best interact with your team in order to get valuable results. The goal is to try and remediate their deficiencies so that next year, you can confidently categorize them as A or B customers or conclude that they are D customers and remove them from your business.</p>
<p>As you take action with C and D customers,<strong> do not forget about your B customers</strong>. They are happy and cooperative because they are satisfied with your service, so make sure to keep it up.</p>
<p>The final (and ongoing) step is to <strong>show more love to your A customers</strong>. As the clients who are actively growing your business for you, they deserve the majority of your attention and focus. Make an effort to establish systems for extra communication, care, and valuable service for your A customers in order to reinforce that reciprocal relationship.</p>
</p>
<p>When you handle each client with the action appropriate to their grade, you will encourage a positive feedback loop of cooperative customers and quality service. You will stop holding your business back and start promoting margin growth.</p>
<p>When you have a roster of excellent clients, you’ll be able to truthfully say: “the customer is always right.”</p>
</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="tcb_flag" style="display: none"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">487</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
